Crédit Industriel et Commercial v Teo Wai Cheong: Dispute over Equity Accumulator Transactions

Crédit Industriel et Commercial (CIC), a French bank, sued Teo Wai Cheong, a former private banking client, in the High Court of Singapore, regarding a dispute over equity accumulator transactions. CIC claimed Teo instructed his relationship manager to purchase five China Energy (CE) accumulators, which Teo denied. The court, presided over by Justice Chan Seng Onn, found in favor of CIC, holding Teo liable for the outstanding amounts due for CE shares accumulated and the costs of closing out the disputed accumulators. Teo's counterclaim against CIC was dismissed.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Judgment for Plaintiff

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

French bank CIC sues Teo Wai Cheong over disputed equity accumulator transactions. The court found Teo liable for the disputed transactions.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Chan Seng OnnJudgeYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. Teo opened a private banking account with CIC in August 2006.
  2. Ng was Teo's relationship manager at CIC.
  3. Teo signed three standard form contracts with CIC.
  4. Teo was granted a loan facility of up to US$5 million.
  5. Between July and October 2007, twenty equity accumulators were purchased under Teo’s CIC account.
  6. CIC claimed Teo instructed Ng to purchase the disputed accumulators, which Teo denied.
  7. CIC closed-out the disputed accumulators after Teo failed to pay.
  8. CIC exercised its rights to realise assets in Teo's account to offset the debt.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Crédit Industriel et Commercial v Teo Wai Cheong, Suit No 626 of 2008, [2012] SGHC 94
  2. Crédit Industriel et Commercial v Teo Wai Cheong, , [2010] 3 SLR 1149
  3. Teo Wai Cheong v Crédit Industriel et Commercial, , [2011] SGCA 13

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Teo opened a private banking account with CIC
Teo signed CIC’s Banking Facility Letter and CIC’s Charge Agreement
First equity accumulator was purchased under Teo’s CIC account
Last equity accumulator was purchased under Teo’s CIC account
Ng telephoned Teo to request for funds to enlarge his account
Ng contacted Teo and revealed that she had entered into the Disputed Accumulators and the Sembcorp Accumulator for Teo
Ng contacted Teo and informed him that the Sembcorp Accumulator had been knocked out
Ng requested for a sum of S$160,000 to pay for the First CE Accumulator, the Second CE Accumulator and the Sembcorp Accumulator
Teo issued a cheque for S$160,000 to CIC
Ng informed Teo that her superiors had lectured her and wanted her to persuade Teo to reassign the accumulators to his other investment account, mortgage his house or transfer more funds from his Citibank account
Teo instructed CIC to sell 180,000 CE shares which he had acquired under the First to Seventh CE Accumulators
Teo met with Kwek to complain about the Disputed Accumulators
CIC’s solicitors demanded that Teo pay what he owed to CIC for shares delivered under the Disputed Accumulators
CIC closed-out Seventh CE Accumulator with Goldman Sachs
CIC closed-out Fourth and Fifth CE Accumulators with DBS
CIC closed-out Third and Sixth CE Accumulators with DBS and Goldman Sachs
CIC issued a conclusive certificate of indebtedness
First trial before a Judicial Commissioner
Court of Appeal ordered a re-trial of this suit
Decision Date
Defendant's appeals to this decision were allowed by the Court of Appeal

7. Legal Issues

  1. Breach of Contract
    • Outcome: The court found that Teo breached the contract by failing to pay for the shares delivered under the equity accumulators.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Repudiation of contract
      • Failure to pay for shares delivered
  2. Authority to Transact
    • Outcome: The court found that Teo had authorized the purchase of the disputed accumulators.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Oral instruction
      • Unauthorised trading
  3. Contractual Interpretation
    • Outcome: The court interpreted the terms and conditions of the agreements to determine the rights and obligations of the parties.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Terms and Conditions of Account Opening and Custodian Agreement
      • Banking Facility Letter
      • Charge Agreement
  4. Admissibility of Evidence
    • Outcome: The court allowed the admission of Ng's affidavits of evidence-in-chief and her oral evidence from the first trial as evidence for the re-trial pursuant to section 33 of the Evidence Act.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Section 33 of the Evidence Act
      • Evidence given by a witness in a judicial proceeding

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Monetary Damages

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of Contract

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation
  • Banking Litigation
  • Financial Disputes

11. Industries

  • Banking
  • Financial Services

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Crédit Industriel et Commercial v Teo Wai CheongHigh CourtYes[2010] 3 SLR 1149SingaporeCited to indicate the decision of the first trial, which was later set aside by the Court of Appeal.
Teo Wai Cheong v Crédit Industriel et CommercialCourt of AppealYes[2011] SGCA 13SingaporeCited for the Court of Appeal's decision to set aside the judgment of the Judicial Commissioner and order a new trial due to the non-disclosure of certain information and documents.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Supreme Court of Judicature Act (Cap 322, 2007 Rev Ed)Singapore
Evidence Act (Cap. 97)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Equity Accumulator
  • Relationship Manager
  • Private Banking
  • Oral Instruction
  • Risk Disclosure Statement
  • Banking Facility Letter
  • Charge Agreement
  • Knock-out Price
  • Forward Price
  • Maximum Obligation
  • Closing-out Costs
  • Conclusive Certificate of Indebtedness

15.2 Keywords

  • Equity Accumulator
  • Breach of Contract
  • Banking Facility
  • Investment Dispute
  • Financial Litigation

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Banking
  • Finance
  • Contract Law
  • Investments