Zhang Yijun v ING Asia: Appeal Against Bifurcation Order in Misrepresentation & Breach of Duty Claim

In Zhang Yijun and others v ING Asia Private Bank Ltd, the High Court of Singapore heard an appeal by the defendant, ING Asia Private Bank Ltd, against an order to bifurcate the trial. The plaintiffs, Zhang Yijun and others, brought an action against the defendant based on misrepresentation and breaches of duties. The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the bifurcation order, finding that the issues of liability and quantum were closely intertwined and should be tried together by the same judge.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Appeal Allowed

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

The High Court allowed an appeal against a bifurcation order in a case involving misrepresentation and breach of duty claims against ING Asia Private Bank.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Zhang YijunPlaintiffIndividualAppeal DismissedLost
ING Asia Private Bank LtdDefendant, AppellantCorporationAppeal AllowedWon
Zhang Yijun's daughterPlaintiffIndividualAppeal DismissedLost
Investment holding companies set up by Zhang YijunPlaintiffCorporationAppeal DismissedLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Choo Han TeckJYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. The plaintiffs filed an action against the defendant bank based on misrepresentation and breaches of duties.
  2. The plaintiffs' claim involved five accounts maintained with the defendant.
  3. The Assistant Registrar granted the plaintiffs' application to bifurcate the trial.
  4. The defendant appealed against the order for bifurcation.
  5. The trial was initially scheduled for ten days commencing on 9 January 2012.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Zhang Yijun and others v ING Asia Private Bank Ltd, Suit No 1080 of 2009 (Registrar's Appeal No 304 of 2011), [2011] SGHC 231

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Lawsuit filed
Experts’ reports exchanged
Pre-trial conference held
Application to bifurcate trial filed
Application to bifurcate trial granted
Judgment issued
Affidavits of evidence-in-chief due to be exchanged
Trial scheduled to commence

7. Legal Issues

  1. Bifurcation of Trial
    • Outcome: The court held that the trial should not be bifurcated because the issues of liability and quantum were closely intertwined.
    • Category: Procedural

8. Remedies Sought

  1. No remedies sought

9. Cause of Actions

  • Misrepresentation
  • Breach of Duty

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation

11. Industries

  • Finance

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
No cited cases

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
No applicable statutes

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Bifurcation
  • Misrepresentation
  • Breach of Duty
  • Liability
  • Quantum of Damages

15.2 Keywords

  • Bifurcation
  • Misrepresentation
  • Breach of Duty
  • Banking
  • Singapore
  • High Court

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Civil Litigation
  • Banking