Amrae Benchuan Trading v Lek Benedict: Directors' Duties & Unfair Preference

In Amrae Benchuan Trading Pte Ltd (in liquidation) v Lek Benedict and Others, the High Court of Singapore heard a claim by the company's liquidator against former directors Lek Benedict and Lim Wee Chuan, and Axum Marketing Pte Ltd, alleging breach of fiduciary duties and unfair preference under the Bankruptcy Act. The liquidator argued the directors improperly transferred company assets to Axum and paid themselves directors' fees while the company was insolvent. The court found the directors gave undue preference to Axum and the second defendant unduly preferred himself, awarding judgment to the plaintiff but ordering a set-off against costs owed to the defendants from a prior related suit.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $419,435.93 against the defendants and judgment against the second defendant in the sum of $115,000, with costs.

1.3 Case Type

Insolvency

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Liquidator claims directors breached duties by transferring assets to another company and paying fees when insolvent. Judgment for plaintiff, but set-off ordered.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Amrae Benchuan Trading Pte Ltd (in liquidation)PlaintiffCorporationJudgment for PlaintiffWon
Lek BenedictDefendantIndividualJudgment against DefendantLost
Lim Wee ChuanDefendantIndividualJudgment against DefendantLost
Axum Marketing Pte LtdDefendantCorporationJudgment against DefendantLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Lai Siu ChiuJudgeYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Vijay KumarVijay & Co

4. Facts

  1. The company was wound up by court order on 19 September 2003.
  2. The first and second defendants were shareholders and directors of the company and Axum Marketing Pte Ltd.
  3. The company transferred crystal stock worth $1,268,983.02 to Axum on credit terms.
  4. The defendants withdrew funds from the company to repay themselves loans and directors’ fees.
  5. Niklex Supply Company obtained judgment against the company for $1,010,289.54.
  6. The company was insolvent from at least 31 March 2001.
  7. David Chan, Niklex's manager, underwrote the cost of the litigation.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Amrae Benchuan Trading Pte Ltd (in liquidation) v Lek Benedict and Others, Suit 424/2005, [2006] SGHC 75

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Amrae Benchuan Trading Pte Ltd incorporated
Concept Gifts business registered
Amrae Benchuan Sdn Bhd (Malaysian company) incorporated
Memco Pte Ltd (later Axum Marketing Pte Ltd) incorporated
Amrae Benchuan Trading Pte Ltd started supplying goods to Axum Marketing Pte Ltd
Tang Yoke Kheng sued Amrae Benchuan Trading Pte Ltd
Concept Gifts Pte Ltd incorporated
Niklex obtained judgment against Amrae Benchuan Trading Pte Ltd
Consent judgment against Amrae Benchuan Trading Pte Ltd
Amrae Benchuan Trading Pte Ltd wound up
Don Ho Mun-Tuke replaced the Official Receiver as the liquidator
Judgment reserved

7. Legal Issues

  1. Breach of Fiduciary Duty
    • Outcome: The court found that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties by giving undue preference to Axum and the second defendant unduly preferred himself.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Conflict of interest
      • Failure to act bona fide in the best interests of the company
      • Improper use of company assets
  2. Unfair Preference
    • Outcome: The court found that the defendants gave undue preference to Axum in relation to the sum of $419,435.93 and that the second defendant unduly preferred himself in relation to the sum of $115,000.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Recovery of funds transferred from the company to the defendants and Axum

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of Fiduciary Duty
  • Unfair Preference

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation
  • Insolvency Litigation

11. Industries

  • Retail
  • Import/Export

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Tang Yoke Kheng v Lek BenedictHigh CourtYes[2004] 4 SLR 788SingaporeCited for the dismissal of Tang's action based on s 340 of the Companies Act regarding the transfer of crystal ware from the Company to Axum.
Tang Yoke Kheng v Lek BenedictCourt of AppealYes[2005] 3 SLR 263SingaporeCited for the dismissal of Tang's appeal against the dismissal of the third suit and the notice of motion for a stay of execution.
Tang Yoke Kheng v Lek BenedictHigh CourtYes[2004] 3 SLR 12SingaporeCited for setting aside the ex parte injunctions and mandatory orders obtained by Tang against the defendants and Gregory.
Re Tang Yoke KhengHigh CourtYes[2006] 1 SLR 351SingaporeCited for the dismissal of the appeals against the assistant registrar’s decision regarding the stay orders on the judgment in the third suit.
Browne v DunnHouse of LordsYes(1894) 6 R 67 (HL)United KingdomCited for the principle that allegations made against a witness that are not challenged in cross-examination stand as evidence.
Re MC Bacon Ltd (No 1)N/AYes[1990] BCLC 324United KingdomCited for the principle that a transaction will not be set aside as a voidable preference unless the company positively wished to improve the creditor’s position in the event of its own insolvent liquidation.
Re Libra Industries Pte LtdHigh CourtYes[2000] 1 SLR 84SingaporeCited for adopting the dicta in Re MC Bacon Ltd (No 1) regarding voidable preference.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Bankruptcy Act (Cap 20, 2000 Rev Ed)Singapore
Companies Act (Cap 50, 1994 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Unfair preference
  • Fiduciary duty
  • Insolvency
  • Directors' fees
  • Liquidation
  • Crystal ware
  • Niklex
  • Axum
  • David Chan
  • Running account

15.2 Keywords

  • Insolvency
  • Directors' duties
  • Unfair preference
  • Liquidation
  • Singapore
  • Company law

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Insolvency
  • Corporate Governance
  • Directors' Duties