C & K Credit Pte Ltd v Lee Chin Kwee Kalvin: Appeal Against Dismissal of Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand

In C & K Credit Pte Ltd v Lee Chin Kwee Kalvin, the High Court of Singapore heard an appeal by Lee Chin Kwee Kalvin against the assistant registrar's decision to dismiss his application to set aside a statutory demand by C & K Credit Pte Ltd. The court, presided over by Judicial Commissioner Choo Han Teck, allowed the appeal on 21 October 2002, finding that the debt stated in the statutory demand was not properly accounted for, as deductions from the proceeds of the sale of a car were not adequately explained.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Appeal Allowed

1.3 Case Type

Insolvency

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Appeal regarding the dismissal of an application to set aside a statutory demand. The court allowed the appeal, citing a flaw in the debt accounting.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Lee Chin Kwee KalvinAppellantIndividualAppeal AllowedWon
C & K Credit Pte LtdRespondentCorporationStatutory Demand Set AsideLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Choo Han TeckJudicial CommissionerYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. Orient Consumer Credit Pte Ltd entered into a hire purchase agreement with Francis Marcel.
  2. The debtor signed a separate agreement with Orient Consumer Credit Pte Ltd as the guarantor for Francis Marcel.
  3. Marcel defaulted, and Orient Credit Pte Ltd called upon the guarantee.
  4. Judgment was entered against the debtor on 24 July 2001.
  5. Orient Credit Pte Ltd executed a deed of assignment in favor of the petitioning creditors on 18 October 2001.
  6. The car was wrecked in Malaysia and towed back to Singapore.
  7. The petitioning creditors de-registered the car and obtained $55,282 from the Land Transport Authority.

5. Formal Citations

  1. C & K Credit Pte Ltd v Lee Chin Kwee Kalvin, OS Bankruptcy No 33 of 2002, RA No 252 of 2002, [2002] SGHC 245

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Judgment entered against the debtor
Orient Credit Pte Ltd executed a deed of assignment in favor of the petitioning creditors
Notice of Assignment was served on the debtor
Statutory demand of the petitioning creditors
Appeal allowed

7. Legal Issues

  1. Setting aside of statutory demand
    • Outcome: The court allowed the appeal and set aside the statutory demand.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Whether debt stated in the statutory demand properly accounted for
  2. Validity of Notice of Assignment
    • Outcome: The court held that the notice of assignment can be served at the same time as the statutory demand.
    • Category: Substantive
  3. Assignment of Rights Under Guarantee
    • Outcome: The court found that the deed of assignment sufficiently assigned the rights under the guarantee to the petitioning creditors.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Setting aside of statutory demand

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of Guarantee

10. Practice Areas

  • Bankruptcy
  • Commercial Litigation

11. Industries

  • Finance

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Compania Columbiana De Seguros v Pacific Steam Navigation CoQueen's BenchNo[1965] 1 QB 101England and WalesCited regarding the notice of assignment but distinguished by the court.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
No applicable statutes

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Statutory demand
  • Deed of assignment
  • Hire purchase agreement
  • Guarantee
  • Chose-in-action
  • Notice of assignment
  • Bankruptcy proceedings

15.2 Keywords

  • Bankruptcy
  • Statutory Demand
  • Assignment
  • Guarantee
  • Singapore
  • High Court

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Bankruptcy
  • Insolvency
  • Assignment