Soo Nam Yuen v Keim Mineral Paints: Wrongful Dismissal Claim

In Soo Nam Yuen v Keim Mineral Paints Singapore Pte Ltd, the High Court of Singapore heard a claim by Soo Nam Yuen against Keim Mineral Paints Singapore Pte Ltd, Peter Neri, Friedrich Rudolf Karle, and Keimfarben Gmbh Co Kg for wrongful dismissal. Soo Nam Yuen, the former Managing Director of Keim Mineral Paints Singapore Pte Ltd, alleged that his termination was in breach of his employment contract. The court, presided over by Justice S Rajendran, found that the termination was indeed a breach of contract and granted judgment to Soo Nam Yuen against Keim Mineral Paints Singapore Pte Ltd, with damages to be assessed. The claims against the other defendants were dismissed.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Judgment for Plaintiff

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Judgment

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Soo Nam Yuen sues Keim Mineral Paints for wrongful dismissal. The court finds the termination breached the employment contract, awarding judgment to Soo Nam Yuen.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Soo Nam YuenPlaintiffIndividualJudgment for PlaintiffWon
Keim Mineral Paints Singapore Pte LtdDefendantCorporationJudgment against DefendantLost
Peter NeriDefendantIndividualClaim DismissedDismissed
Friedrich Rudolf KarleDefendantIndividualClaim DismissedDismissed
Keimfarben Gmbh Co KgDefendantCorporationClaim DismissedDismissed

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
S RajendranJudgeYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. Plaintiff was the Managing Director of the 1st defendants.
  2. The 4th defendants hold 90% of the shares of the 1st defendants, and the plaintiff held the balance of 10%.
  3. Plaintiff's employment contract stated his services could only be terminated on specific events.
  4. Plaintiff was informed on 17 January 2000 that his services were terminated.
  5. Defendants claimed plaintiff paid staff bonuses against instructions.
  6. Plaintiff claimed the bonus payment was authorized by the 2nd defendant.
  7. The 2nd defendant did not testify in the proceedings.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Soo Nam Yuen v Keim Mineral Paints Singapore Pte Ltd and Others, Suit 139/2000, [2000] SGHC 235

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Keim Mineral Paints Singapore Pte Ltd incorporated.
Plaintiff's employment contract extended for 5 years.
Plaintiff sent a fax to the 4th defendants regarding bonus payment.
4th defendants sent a fax to the plaintiff regarding bonus payment.
Plaintiff sent a fax to the 4th defendants complaining about the 3rd defendant's attitude.
Plaintiff was informed of termination of services.
Termination Notice handed to the plaintiff.
Letter regarding reorganization of Asian business handed to the plaintiff.
Summon-in-Chambers No. 102 of 2000 application by 1st defendants.
Judgment issued.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Wrongful Dismissal
    • Outcome: The court held that the termination of the plaintiff's employment was in breach of the terms of the contract of employment.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Breach of employment contract
      • Misconduct
      • Material breach of contract

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Damages for wrongful dismissal

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of Contract

10. Practice Areas

  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Commercial Litigation

11. Industries

  • Paints
  • Retail

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
No cited cases

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
No applicable statutes

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Wrongful dismissal
  • Employment contract
  • Termination of employment
  • Staff bonus
  • Managing director

15.2 Keywords

  • wrongful dismissal
  • employment contract
  • termination
  • bonus
  • managing director
  • Keim Mineral Paints

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Employment Dispute
  • Contractual Dispute