STL Machinery v Hai Leck Marine: Indemnity for Shipping Dispute over Crane Volume

In STL Machinery Pte Ltd v Hai Leck Marine Contractor Pte Ltd, the High Court of Singapore addressed a dispute arising from the shipment of cranes to Manila. STL Machinery, the owner of the cranes, contracted with Hai Leck Marine, a shipping company, for the shipment. A dispute arose over the measurement of the cranes, leading to the shipowners exercising a lien on the cargo. The consignee, Singapino Corporation, paid to release the cranes and claimed losses from STL Machinery, who then sought indemnity from Hai Leck Marine. The court varied the Assistant Registrar’s orders, ruling that while STL Machinery was entitled to indemnity and damages, the specific amounts recoverable would be subject to assessment.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Appeal dismissed with variation; indemnity and damages recoverable are to be assessed.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Shipping dispute over crane volume led to consignee payment for release. STL Machinery sought indemnity from Hai Leck Marine. Court varied order for assessment of damages.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
STL Machinery Pte LtdPlaintiff, RespondentCorporationEntitled to indemnity and damages, amount to be assessedPartial
Hai Leck Marine Contractor Pte LtdDefendant, AppellantCorporationAppeal dismissed with variationLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Kan Ting ChiuJudgeYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. STL Machinery contracted with Hai Leck Marine to ship cranes to Manila.
  2. A dispute arose over the measurement of the cranes.
  3. Hai Leck Marine declared the measurement of the cranes as 1400 cubic metres.
  4. The shipowners exercised a lien on the cargo due to a dispute over measurement.
  5. The consignee paid US$37,596.75 to secure the release of the cranes.
  6. STL Machinery sought indemnity from Hai Leck Marine for losses incurred.

5. Formal Citations

  1. STL Machinery Pte Ltd v Hai Leck Marine Contractor Pte Ltd, Suit 1592/1999, RA 600040/2000, [2000] SGHC 112

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Contract entered between STL Machinery and Hai Leck Marine for shipment of cranes.
STL Machinery prepared a packing list for their internal records.
Cranes transported from STL Machinery’s yard to the port.
Hai Leck Marine made their own measurement before loading.
Cranes loaded on the vessel MV Royal Progress.
Vessel arrived at Manila.
Shipowners ceased discharging the cargo and exercised their lien.
Letter from the plaintiffs to the defendants specifically referred to Singapino Corporation as the consignee.
Judgment delivered.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Breach of Contract
    • Outcome: The court found that the defenses raised did not excuse the defendants from their obligation to deliver the cargo to the consignee.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Failure to deliver cargo
      • Misrepresentation of cargo volume
  2. Indemnity
    • Outcome: The court ruled that the plaintiffs are entitled to the indemnity they sought, but the amount recoverable must be proved.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Declaration of entitlement to indemnity
  2. Indemnity in the sum of $301,476.43
  3. Damages in the sum of $3,258.78
  4. Interest
  5. Costs

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of Contract
  • Indemnity

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation
  • Shipping Disputes

11. Industries

  • Shipping
  • Construction

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
No cited cases

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
No applicable statutes

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Crawler cranes
  • Tower cranes
  • Shipping
  • Lumpsum freight
  • Lien
  • Consignee
  • Misrepresentation
  • Indemnity

15.2 Keywords

  • shipping
  • cranes
  • indemnity
  • contract
  • marine

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Contract Dispute
  • Shipping Dispute
  • Indemnity